Posted on 09/03/2015 10:03:37 AM PDT by GIdget2004
Courts do not create law, they create precedent.
The USSC has exerted its power beyond its authority.
Some.
Nor is extending US Government benefits to homosexual marriage quite the same, morally, as executing people.
That remains to be seen, and it ignores the larger point of doing what the government tells you to do against a long standing moral prohibition against it.
Doing what the government says contrary to natural law leads to gas chambers. That is exactly where it leads, and while we're on the subject, the Original Nazis were a bunch of homosexuals too. Too much proof to post. Here are a couple of Links.
You may not see it, but this stuff is pure concentrated evil. The Nazis were the most horrible group the world has ever seen, and the essence of them was made up of this mental illness known as homosexuality.
I am a cynic. Hence my handle. I'm also seldom wrong about the consequences of what I see. This business that we are seeing here I saw coming decades ago.
The Feds probably had to travel on state/county/city roads on their way to and from the federal courthouse. Sheriff trumps Feds on state/county/city property.
Elected! I didn’t realize.
Bless her heart, she is really putting it on the line.
Disobedience to God is not one of those things rightful to render to Caesar.
Your belief that state licensure for marriage creates some kind of wholesome social environment is spurious. Marriage was never a contract with the state until early in the 20th century. It has become a worthless and troublesome infringement on personal liberty. Now, with the requirement to acknowledgement the legitimacy of buggering as a state recognized life style, marriage has lost most of its legitimacy. The church must retake its prerogative and abandon the state with its grievous demands.
Call it what you will. Marriage is first and foremost a religious rite, not a government mandated contract.
You said you were rarely wrong about consequences.
Well this is consequences proving you right, what is there to complain about! You constructed your own box.
You can keep surrendering until you get all the way to the other side.
The government of today has proven it is incompetent to regulate marriage.
So take the sharp object from it until, if ever, it regains its sanity.
Not a bad idea at all.
Stand strong, sister in Christ! You’ve joined the ranks of the great ones, such as Paul and Simon Peter, all of whom were jailed and persecuted for Jesus.
You are the Mr. Unstoppable Train Of Consequences... you should talk...
No surrender here. Any pastor that performs a wedding ceremony without benefit of state license will find himself arrested as well. The state demands the right to authorize all weddings. Try it. See what happens.
Is there anyplace I can send her a donation?
Is there anyplace I can send her a donation?
Soon you may just hand it through the bars from the next cell.
This needs to be changed. The government isn’t competent in this department any more. Yes, this would get a gaggle of “churches” like UU involved with “gay marriage” but the important thing is that it doesn’t shanghai the hand of We The People any more. Sinners can choose to sin and believers can choose not to.
Do you support child marriage?
.
Why might that be?
.
Do you support consanguineous marriage?
The bible supports marriage at startlingly young ages compared to modern notions. Do you claim that nothing would militate against Mohammed like situations if marriage was taken away from government?
Because we never know what will next be deemed illegal.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.