Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TexasFreeper2009
That depends on how you define liberalism.

To a old liberal (pre-1960) the liberals of today would be considered commie anarchists.

The "old liberals" went right along with all the changes in liberalism as they happened. Does anyone recall Hubert Humphrey objecting to abortion? Doesn't Jimmy Carter support "gay marriage?"

If FDR were still with us, he'd be wheeling his 133 year old carcass at the head of a pro-bestiality parade.

79 posted on 09/02/2015 8:25:31 AM PDT by Zionist Conspirator (The "end of history" will be Worldwide Judaic Theocracy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies ]


To: Zionist Conspirator
The difference is FDR was willing to stand up to tyrany and use force if necessary in defense of freedom and what he believed to be a morally superior form of government.

The liberals of today believe there are no moral absolutes and that force should never be used, even force to defend ones country, freedom or even life. And that Capitalism is the true evil infecting this world along with the evil white colonialist.

87 posted on 09/02/2015 8:59:12 AM PDT by TexasFreeper2009 (You can't spell Hillary without using the letters L, I, A, & R)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson