Skip to comments.
Rush Limbaugh Recognizes The GOPe Splitter Strategy…
The Conservative Treehouse ^
| 9/1/15
| Sundance
Posted on 09/01/2015 6:31:32 PM PDT by Amntn
The GOPe road map to nominate Jeb Bush is becoming more transparent each day. Since we initially outlined the construct of the establishment republican scheme we have been subjected to consistent criticism by those with a vested interest in either ignoring, or protecting, the fraud.
However, today radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh joined us, and thus begins to awaken an even larger audience. We can expect the inbound fire to increase exponentially:
(Excerpt) Read more at theconservativetreehouse.com ...
TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2016gopprimary; election; rush; sundance; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
To: Yosemitest; TheStickman
Im a conservative who believes the war on drugs is epic fail kept in a trillion dollar can of fail. I want my government to de-criminialize pot & other drugs with a few specific caveats.I do NOT agree on drugs.
So you think the war on drugs has succeeded?
101
posted on
09/02/2015 8:36:38 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
To: ConservingFreedom
It's a farce.
It has NOT succeeded BECAUSE THE POLITICIANS DO NOT WANT IT TO !
If I were in charge, the politicians would be the FIRST to go to jail, and for the LONGEST period of time.
The drug dealers would not be in jail very long, because they'd get a rapid EXECUTION of their sentenced punishment, which would be an overdose of their own drugs !
102
posted on
09/02/2015 8:47:25 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Amntn
Rush is simply working to take Jeb out.
103
posted on
09/02/2015 8:56:01 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Yosemitest
It has NOT succeeded BECAUSE THE POLITICIANS DO NOT WANT IT TO !
If I were in charge, the politicians would be the FIRST to go to jail, and for the LONGEST period of time.
The drug dealers would not be in jail very long, because they'd get a rapid EXECUTIONThe politicians are constrained by what the courts have ruled regarding the Constitutional rights of defendants, as would you be. Currently drug dealers execute each other faster than our justice system could ever do - but the still-living ones continue to deal and the dead ones are quickly replaced. The war on drugs is a war on supply and demand and as such its failure is inevitable.
104
posted on
09/02/2015 9:04:01 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
To: Yosemitest
I didn’t say deconstruction. I said destruction. We are in agreement.
105
posted on
09/02/2015 9:08:41 AM PDT
by
Amntn
To: Amntn
My mistake. I guess I need my reading glasses again.
Sorry.
106
posted on
09/02/2015 9:57:57 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: ConservingFreedom
The politicians have a tool to overcome bad Judges.
It's called IMPEACHMENT and CONVICTION.
107
posted on
09/02/2015 9:59:14 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Nep Nep
My FRiend, if you think Rand Paul's position (see below) to grant "a work status" for the "11 million who are here" (i.e., the "11 million" who broke our laws and are here illegally) is not amnesty, then you and I differ on what constitutes reality.
Q: You have said that the 11 million immigrants in this country already here should have some legal status and pay taxes. You want to find some sort of legal status for them?
PAUL: What I want to do first is secure the border. If we secure the border and we can say who is coming, who is going, and only people come, come legally, the 11 million that are here, I think there could be a work status for them. And I think what I have tried to say is, what we want is more legal immigration, so we have less illegal immigration. But I am open to immigration reform. I voted against the bill that came forward, though, primarily because it limited the number of legal work visas.
To: Biggirl
Jeb’s not out until Hillary has a competitive primary test - which may yet happen.
Otherwise the Dems have a decent shot at powering Jeb to the Republican nomination. He’d definitely make the softest target in November.
109
posted on
09/02/2015 10:04:26 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Impeach, convict, deport)
To: Amntn
The GOP-E strategy would have worked—but they did not anticipate being Trumped.
Donald Trump is the best thing to happen in 2015.
He has singlehandedly re-ordered the political battlefield and re-contoured the political landscape.
He has done America a great service by jumping into the race.
Our “betters” had different plans for us.
110
posted on
09/02/2015 10:10:58 AM PDT
by
exit82
("The Taliban is on the inside of the building" E. Nordstrom 10-10-12)
To: nascarnation
Yet when Jeb starts attacking the Donald in a Spanish speaking ad, that shows me that he is showing signs of desperation.
111
posted on
09/02/2015 10:25:14 AM PDT
by
Biggirl
("One Lord, one faith, one baptism" - Ephesians 4:5)
To: Biggirl
Anybody know the Spanish translation of Operation Chaos 2016?
112
posted on
09/02/2015 10:35:34 AM PDT
by
nascarnation
(Impeach, convict, deport)
To: Yosemitest
The politicians are constrained by what the courts have ruled regarding the Constitutional rights of defendants, as would you be. The politicians have a tool to overcome bad Judges.
It's called IMPEACHMENT and CONVICTION.
No, ruling on a Constitutional issue in a way the politicians disagree with is not an impeachable offense.
Currently drug dealers execute each other faster than our justice system could ever do - but the still-living ones continue to deal and the dead ones are quickly replaced. The war on drugs is a war on supply and demand and as such its failure is inevitable.
No response to these points?
113
posted on
09/02/2015 10:51:20 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
Comment #114 Removed by Moderator
Comment #115 Removed by Moderator
To: glennaro
What Reagan did was amnesty; what Yeb/Rubio/Kasich/Fiorina etc. want is amnesty. The Paul plan is not.
A work visa can be conditional, and it can be revoked - a vast improvement over the current situation where because no permission is given, none can be removed. It would also re-establish the crucial concept of the rule of law, as well as to help discard the bizarre notion of birthright citizenship for the spawn of foreign citizens.
Is this my ideal solution? No. Left up to me, I’d tell every single immigrant, legal and illegal, to pack their bags and be out by the end of the month. However, calling the Paul plan “amnesty” dilutes the term and deflects from the real danger of actual amnesty proposals by leaders from both parties.
116
posted on
09/02/2015 11:38:42 AM PDT
by
Nep Nep
To: ConservingFreedom
"No, ruling on a Constitutional issue in a way the politicians disagree with is not an impeachable offense."
WRONG !
You need to read more.
Also watch this:
Full Speech: Mark Levin Addresses ALEC's State & Nation Summit ( 34:33 )
WesternFreePress
Published on Dec 6, 2014
Constitutional scholar, author, and radio talk show host Mark Levin delivers a passionate speech at the State & Nation Policy Summit at the American Legislative Exchange Council Conference, Dec 4, 2014.
Levin is a powerful advocate for our state legislatures/legislators to use Article V of the Constitution, as intended, to rein in a runaway federal government.
He is the author of "Liberty Amendments", a benchmark book on the use of Article V by We the People, through our STATE legislators,
to take our country back from the overreaching, overtaxing, overregulating, and overbearing legislative-class elites in Washington, DC.
You asked:
"Currently drug dealers execute each other faster than our justice system could ever do but the still-living ones continue to deal and the dead ones are quickly replaced.
The war on drugs is a war on supply and demand and as such its failure is inevitable.
No response to these points?"
Reread the above links and watch the video.
AGAIN I SAY:
It has NOT succeeded BECAUSE THE POLITICIANS DO NOT WANT IT TO !
117
posted on
09/02/2015 11:42:22 AM PDT
by
Yosemitest
(It's Simple ! Fight, ... or Die !)
To: Yosemitest
You asked: "Currently drug dealers execute each other faster than our justice system could ever do but the still-living ones continue to deal and the dead ones are quickly replaced. The war on drugs is a war on supply and demand and as such its failure is inevitable.
No response to these points?"
Reread the above links and watch the video.
They don't address the quoted points.
AGAIN I SAY:
Repetition is not a response.
118
posted on
09/02/2015 11:50:05 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
To: Yosemitest
Article V of the ConstitutionNot impeachment.
119
posted on
09/02/2015 11:50:58 AM PDT
by
ConservingFreedom
(a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
Comment #120 Removed by Moderator
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120, 121-134 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson