Posted on 09/01/2015 8:17:31 AM PDT by MeshugeMikey
A Kentucky county clerk, defying a new U.S. Supreme Court decision, rejected requests for marriage licenses from three same-sex couples on Tuesday in a deepening legal standoff now two months old, attorneys for the couples said.
Citing her religious objections, Rowan County Clerk Kim Davis has refused to issue any marriage licenses since the Supreme Court in June ruled that same-sex couples had the right to marry under the U.S. Constitution.
(Excerpt) Read more at reuters.com ...
Anyone know for sure, have a source?
I don't know if she is a Democrat but she has been married four times. Which is the height of irony.
Exactly....
taking a meaningful stand...particularly one thats become this unpopular requires quite a bit of courage!
I’m waiting for the first license issued to a man and his dog....
That, I do not know
See post 21 in this thread.
It’s Kentucky. As you age your teeth to marriage ratio is supposed to approach 1.
(my Kentucky native wife and inlaws wouldn’t think that’s funny, btw)
Someone please help me here. Where in the U.S. Constitution is the “gay marriage” right? Where is the legislation written by congress and signed into law by a president? There is no gay marriage law. Same as Roe v Wade. Where is the legislation written by congress and signed into law by a president? There is no pro-abort law. These are “rulings” by the court. Rulings are not law, are they?
That kind of changed with Mitt Romney. The Mass Screams ordered the legislature to change the law, something entirely new. And Mitt went ahead and acted like the law had already been changed. That has now become the new national precedent for situations like this one.
It’s like wildfire. Sometimes if it gets where we don’t want it to be, it’s our fault.
I could be wrong, but I think it refers to the state constitution.
Kentucky Constitution
Section 228
Oath of officers and attorneys.
Members of the General Assembly and all officers, before they enter upon the execution of the duties of their respective offices, and all members of the bar, before they enter upon the practice of their profession, shall take the following oath or affirmation: I do solemnly swear (or affirm, as the case may be) that I will support the Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of this Commonwealth, and be faithful and true to the Commonwealth of Kentucky so long as I continue a citizen thereof, and that I will faithfully execute, to the best of my ability, the office of .... according to law; and I do further solemnly swear (or affirm) that since the adoption of the present Constitution, I, being a citizen of this State, have not fought a duel with deadly weapons within this State nor out of it, nor have I sent or accepted a challenge to fight a duel with deadly weapons, nor have I acted as second in carrying a challenge, nor aided or assisted any person thus offending, so help me God.
Text as Ratified on: August 3, 1891, and revised September 28, 1891.
History: Not yet amended.
That whole “I will support the Constitution of the United States” thing is pretty unequivocal. So just No, on your comment.
Obama is pissing all over his Oath with no consequences.
this is what happens when reality is “fundamentally transformed”...
While I don’t disagree, this had little to do with that, other than indirectly through his USSC appointments.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.