Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DoodleDawg
On the other hand she was elected to carry out the duties of the county clerk, one of which is to issue marriage licenses.

We do not redefine the meaning of clearly understood words just because the Supreme Court says so.

Your argument would compel obedience to a Supreme Court diktat that "black" now means "slave."

We do not allow people to force different meanings of words on us, and we do not give a sh*t if they claim to have the mandate of government behind them.

Anymore than the Muslim grocery clerk who refuses to ring up pork or liquor on religious grounds.

If he is given the job with the implicit understanding that he won't be forced to violate any of his religious beliefs, then he has a legitimate legal argument for breach of contract.

That is what this situation is. It is a breach of the implicit societal contract with this woman.

95 posted on 09/01/2015 7:42:16 AM PDT by DiogenesLamp ("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: DiogenesLamp
That is what this situation is. It is a breach of the implicit societal contract with this woman.

The appropriate remedy for a breach of contract is a lawsuit for the breach. And, it is a court that will decide that breach of contract.

I think that if you're honest about all this, you will acknowledge that you don't believe this dispute should be decided by a court. I think you believe that this case should be decided by this woman - that she should be the judge of her own case.

We don't do things that way in this country.

103 posted on 09/01/2015 8:03:40 AM PDT by Tau Food (Never give a sword to a man who can't dance.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

To: DiogenesLamp; 444Flyer; cyn; MeshugeMikey
The woman has no problem issuing marriage licenses. She has a problem with issuing fake marriage licenses. She is grounded in the reality that marriage is not the same as sodomite couplings (ugh).

Just shows the thug government for what it is, a brute beast forcing people to embrace whatever lie it deems "truth". No surprise, as it acts as if people can switch from being male to female or female to male and by golly, we are all supposed to BELIEVE A LIE or else we are haters.

Yeah, we hate falsehood and hate being told that we must embrace and validate that which is contrary to natural order, reason, and biological truths. We are expected to deny blatant reality.

None of that needs to be framed in a religious context and shouldn't be, because doing so conveniently equates ***simply being in one's right mind*** with being a religious zealot/bigot/hater who has the unmitigated gall to impose his religious beliefs upon others.

Beast.gov is fast redefining truth and sane thinking as [subjective and intolerant] religious tenets that have no business existing in the enlightened, modern world.

Already we see how the mobs of impulsive, self-important, drama queen social media zombies rally around half-truth tales of woe (lies), falsely speaking evil of business owners or managers for racism or hate or for being intolerant of whatever we are supposed to tolerate according to the whiners and liars.

Consensus is their lying king. To speak the truth is to threaten the king and his lying kingdom.

Organizing for Destruction

"Pogrom is a Russian word designating an attack, accompanied by destruction, looting of property, murder, and rape, perpetrated by one section of the population against another."

http://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/History/pogroms.html

181 posted on 09/01/2015 6:06:47 PM PDT by Ezekiel (All who mourn the destruction of America merit the celebration of her rebirth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson