To: Ray76
Homosexual couples can and do use surrogates for impregnation or birthing, as do straight couples. I agree with your moral case against SSM, but our preference has been defeated in the US legal system. And current law must obtain until and unless a future SCOTUS majority decides otherwise.
225 posted on
09/01/2015 11:08:22 PM PDT by
eater-of-toast
("It is much more important to kill bad bills than to pass good ones." --Calvin Coolidge)
To: eater-of-toast
Surrogates? You premise your position on surrogates?
That surrogates are REQUIRED for ANY AND ALL homosexual unions to produce offspring proves my point.
226 posted on
09/01/2015 11:12:18 PM PDT by
Ray76
(When a gov't leads it's people down a path of destruction resistance is not only a right but a duty.)
To: eater-of-toast
has been defeated in the US legal system. And current law must obtain until and unless a future SCOTUS majority decides otherwise. More like we should treat the existing system as "broken" and try to throw as many monkey wrenches into illegal rulings as we possibly can.
What was it that Thomas Jefferson said? "Resistance to tyrants is obedience to God.!"
239 posted on
09/02/2015 6:19:07 AM PDT by
DiogenesLamp
("of parents owing allegiance to no other sovereignty.")
To: eater-of-toast; Ray76
but our preference has been defeated in the US legal system. And current law must obtain until and unless a future SCOTUS majority decides otherwise. Does the phrase, "The laws of nature and of nature's God" mean anything to you?
Cordially,
263 posted on
09/02/2015 8:11:11 PM PDT by
Diamond
(He has erected a multitude of new offices, and sent hither swarms of officers to harass our people,)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson