xzins, what do you say to my comments about the military already being engaged in numerous other activities for their personnel that don't include weapons or training? There are plenty of military hospitals and medical personnel that provide healthcare benefits to active duty military, and likely provide transitional services to those leaving the military.
There's no reason why the Sec. of Defense couldn't ask for funding of veteran's benefits, including those that are disabled, or require other special care. The budget request is a separate line item from all the "war-fighting stuff," and could be spent accordingly. It's called a budget for a reason.
The military forces have combat, support, and service support units that comprise our services. Combat units do the actual fighting. Support units provide coverage of combat necessary operations such as signal, air defense, etc. Service support units are generally logistical but include medical, dental and legal needs of a fighting combat force.
So, in providing for battlefield needs military commanders are providing for that which enables them to be victorious on the battlefield.
Providing care for those who no longer are in the military is not a battlefield operation, and the battlefield is what should be their focus.
There is a conflict of interest between the battlefield and any other distraction. A good general who wants to protect the security of the United States will always seek improved equipment, weapons systems, and training. That’s where he’ll fight to spend his money.
That is why the military should not be in charge of caring for those who no longer are in the military.