You are also making a distinction without difference.
I am trying to point out that he actually DOES fit the model you so blindly think he's going to tear down.
Then you have much undeserved confidence in your persuasive powers, or a rather tenuous grasp on the law of identity.
Hear, hear !
I’ve made the distinction a hundred plus times on FR...your ignorance does not invalidate my truth. I don’t owe you the entire damned explanation because you popped down into the middle of a 12 week old discussion.
It validates my thinking of you however....