See! You deliberately changed the context of the question. Either that or you are totally incompetent as a writer in expressing your opinion. One or the other.
Your words: “Oh, hell, no, a nude model who does lesbian shots as First Lady? Not relevant at all. /s”
You are inferring that Mrs. Trump will do lesbian shots as first lady. That is what you said.
Obviously you’ve never been a model.
Obviously you ignore that the human body is a beautiful creation and has been sculpted and painted for centuries, male and female. Spend a day at the Louvre, you might be surprised.
Obviously you’re so restricted in your thinking that you spend your days judging people by your standards, which include you reading and observing nude pictures so that you can criticize and condemn others.
Sorry, I am not interested in your outrage, which I find out of line.
“Methinks the lady doth protest too much!”
Obviously you have seen these images of which you speak.
You’re not very subtle, are you?
Nope. Not at all, LOL.
.
>> “Obviously youve never been a model.
Obviously you ignore that the human body is a beautiful creation and has been sculpted and painted for centuries, male and female. Spend a day at the Louvre, you might be surprised.” <<
.
Then I suppose that you can enlighten us WRT which works at the Louvre are Lesbo in nature!
which one of your multiple personalities is a lesbian?
.