You have just exposed your totally immature reasoning capability. Coulter was using a deliberately outrageous statement to draw attention to the fact she was extremely happy Trump had opened up the subject verboten to all in the political class, that of illegal “immigrants.” She succeeded. Yet there are those, like you, who would try to nail her to your overzealous cross of perfection for having dared to use such a “sensitive” example. GROW UP!
Immigration MUST be dealt with in order to secure our Sovereignty for future generations. How strange that I never hear you even vaguely mention the IMPORTANT things, only the nit picking slivers of useless misinterpretations that gall you.
Wrong. On page 271 of her latest book, Coulter said that abortion isn't important compared to immigration.
Really? Asking where you stand on abortion is immature? I notice that you never actually address the issue.
Coulter was using a deliberately outrageous statement to draw attention to the fact she was extremely happy Trump had opened up the subject verboten to all in the political class, that of illegal “immigrants.”
Coulter has along history of making outrageous statements and will then later confirm that she meant exactly what she said.
Yet there are those, like you, who would try to nail her to your overzealous cross of perfection for having dared to use such a “sensitive” example. GROW UP!
60 MILLION DEAD BABIES is not an "overzealous cross of perfection," unless it doesn't matter to you.
Immigration MUST be dealt with in order to secure our Sovereignty for future generations.
Unless we stop murdering a baby EVERY 24 SECONDS we need immigration or we face an even bigger demographic problem. You do realize that they come here and take jobs that used to go to teenagers don't you? Teenagers that aren't around anymore.
How strange that I never hear you even vaguely mention the IMPORTANT things, only the nit picking slivers of useless misinterpretations that gall you.
So, the American Holocaust isn't important to you? Caring about the sanctity of life is "nitpicking"?
I've been here a long time, I've made quite a few FRiends and more than my share of enemies (many of whom are no longer here), but only the bona fide trolls believe that my well-known stance on pro-life issues is "nitpicking" or unimportant.
If Jim Robinson wants me to stop pushing the pro-life, pro-morality agenda on Free Republic, I will happily oblige and be on my way. It's Jim's forum and he can change course as he sees fit. But, until that day comes I am not going to sit here and pretend that the ongoing slaughter of innocent Americans isn't the most important issue at hand.
I invite you to read back through my posts over the past ten years, my positions haven't changed. I've never even said that I was fundamentally opposed to voting for Trump (though I doubt he will actually be the nominee). However, I REFUSE to be told that pro-life issues will "have to wait" one more time, I have heard that in EVERY election since Reagan left office. How can I expect someone who stands by and does nothing while innocent babies are slaughtered to actually protect America? Why should expect God to bless an America that sits by idly while this happens?