Posted on 08/31/2015 12:43:37 AM PDT by Behind the Blue Wall
Why Trump?
1. Illegal immigration is the only issue; if it's not stopped soon, America will become like California -- a demographic one-party state.
2. Politics is about name-recognition and none of the other candidates besides Trump has the name recognition to challenge Jeb Bush or Hillary Clinton.
Therefore, Trump is the only candidate with a chance to win who has promised to do the only thing that matters.
Well, he did say that his sister, who is a judge and who supports partial-birth abortion, would make a wonderful Supreme Court justice.
Don’t put words into my mouth. I do not accept that he is a liberal. Because you chose to write this, you’re no better than a liberal hack who writes lies for the MSM.
Did I say Donald Trump was a liberal? Where dis I say that?
How would nominating his sister make the United States worse than it is now? Isn’t Ginsburg bad enough?
The Trump pom pom wavers don't care; he said he will build a wall and that's good enough for them.
Are you drunk? You can't keep track of your own posts. Here:
"Let’s say for the purpose of argument that Donald Trump is this big bombastic billionaire liberal that you have been throwing out on these threads and that he is bamboozling many conservatives with a bunch of doubletalk."
Go home, Hostage. You're drunk.
You're right! So we might as well say the hell with it and elect liberals and appoint Supreme Court justices who support shoving scissors into the skulls of babies!
Anything to elect Magic Trump!
Exactly. Look at Hostage. He's openly saying hey, we might as well put her in there.
Shameless, really.
I give them a chance but when they prove themselves to be mindless followers of "The Donald" they no longer deserve a minute of my time.
Answer these two questions (and they are very fair questions):
FIRST QUESTION
Donald Trump is alleged by you to be a liberal and will by inference nominate liberal Justices for the USSC.
Ronald Reagan was undoubtedly a conservative who nominated two liberal USSC Justices who were selected.
How is alleging someone to be a liberal implies liberal appointments to the USSC, whereas a conservative icon also saw the appointment of liberal Justices to he USSC?
SECOND QUESTION
Is Donald Trump going to nominate a liberal justice who will oppose Donald Trump’s abolishment of the claims of Anchor Babies for birthright citizenship?
You're not answering because the question destroys your whole schtick.
Do I need to repeat it? I think so.
Notice how the Walky-Walk cheerleading duo run away from fair and legitimate questions that they won’t answer because if they do it will destroy their moronic assertions.
You think South and I are Walker supporters?
LOL
No.
I’m not answering your questions because you’re hopeless. You have no problem supporting a liberal-—indeed, even becoming liberal yourself in order to justify doing so.
Also, you don’t even know what you post from moment to moment.
You’re a waste of my time.
It does not matter. Both of you are bullshit artists.
I've reached that point, as well.
The emotionalism, the hysteria, the ranting...reason won't make a dent in any of it.
I’m a Donald watcher. Not a Donald idolator. But some people full of themselves can’t tell the difference.
Don’t correct them. Allow them to continue making fools of themselves. :-)
> “I’m not answering your questions because you’re hopeless.”
Lol! Yeah right. Move along now. It’s obvious you along with your compadre South40 are brain deficient. The word ‘moron’ doesn’t even begin to describe it.
***********************************
For those joining in, you see two posters attempting to portray Donald Trump as a President that will nominate liberal Justices to the US Supreme Court.
They both refuse to address the following question:
Two of Ronald Reagan’s supreme court nominations were Sandra Day O’Connor and Anthony Kennedy. How’d that work out for the United States?
And further they fail to explain how Donald Trump would nominate a liberal USSC Justice that would oppose his abolition of Birthright Citizenship for Anchor Babies.
Both of these two clowns give conservatism a bad name because they are illogical. They are more suited for the back bench of a Salon commentary section.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.