I don't see what any of this has to do with Fiorina's true record at HP and Lucent?
Unless you are saying that her record of success at HP would be a game-changer, so for Trump to be the "one and only," it is necessary that this "very nice woman" has to be dirtied up by spreading and having others to believe the lies about her "failure" and the "terrible job at Hewlett-Packard"?
Why is knowing the real executive / business record of Fiorina such a threat? Is it to distract and divert attention from that DJT stock chart that shows his management to be a dismal failure, in absolute terms and in comparison with just about any CEO in that industry or many other CEOs in other industries, including Fiorina, over the same period of time?
That's like liberals having to convince people of man-made global warming, or their entire agenda would fall apart?
Donald Trump's "magic" for everyone to see, in his own words: "The final key to the way I promote," he wrote, "is bravado. I play to people's fantasies. People may not always think big themselves, but they can still get very excited by those who do. That's why a little hyperbole never hurts."
And Trump, he readily admits that he's bankrupted individual companies. That is normal business. If I recall correctly, even the Bush family has. It is business, not personal. As some of this dealt with casinos, deftly blaming Chris Christie for it.
But, again, do we want a FIRED Fiorina, twice losing political campaigns, or do with want a business builder like Trump. Trump wins this hands down.