Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usconservative

I tend to watch my language on e-mails, but I also tend to be very specific in my language. I consider I highly critical e-mail to be a business document and correspondence that could be used in court. Against me if I use profanity and threats, for me if I keep it businesslike but firm. Typically it is
Fact
Fact
Fact
What is being done to resolve this?
Why has this not been resolved?
When will this be resolved?
Will this need to be escalated to the next level (as in legal action)?
Etc.

Yet in some places this kind of format is considered violent and threatening.


19 posted on 08/30/2015 3:39:35 PM PDT by Fred Hayek (The Democratic Party is now the operational arm of the CPUSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: Fred Hayek
You and I share a very similar approach.
21 posted on 08/30/2015 3:43:57 PM PDT by usconservative (When The Ballot Box No Longer Counts, The Ammunition Box Does. (What's In Your Ammo Box?))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

To: Fred Hayek

When my son was in school all correspondence was sent by registered mail, return receipt requested, and at the bottom I cc’d a well known local attorney.

I never actually copied him on it but just seeing his name at the bottom got results.


23 posted on 08/30/2015 4:01:40 PM PDT by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson