Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Vermont Lt
Your analogy is incomplete.

It’s akin to saying, “I don’t like Trump” and the response is, “You love Obama.”

And then someone says, "I don't like Obama" and the response ISN'T, "You love Trump."

Holding to different standards. Yes, we see the "X, therefore P" as a non-sequitur and likewise "not X, therefore not P" (X and P having absolutely nothing to do with each other), that someone DOES hold a different axiom seeing a connection between X and P belies inconsistency (in the form of bigotry in this case) when they fail to acknowledge a connection (in THEIR axiom set, not ours) between !X and !P.

20 posted on 08/28/2015 9:57:14 PM PDT by ctdonath2 (The world map will be quite different come 20 January 2017.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: ctdonath2

Jesuits? Ha ha.


22 posted on 08/28/2015 10:58:16 PM PDT by Vermont Lt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson