I don’t support a candidate who has supported: Auto bailouts? Bank bailouts, the Stimulus package, Government-run healthcare, Progressive taxation and Hands off unfunded liabilities.
Now if you can argue why these positions dont matter then great.. but if not, deflecting to me is a transparent way that you are blind in your support. I assume this is the case.. so Bye.
Key word is "has" in the past tense. But if you support a candidate who to this day supports amnesty and the continued ransacking of the US Industrial base, then you're a liberal supporting a liberal candidate.
I assume this is the case.. so Bye.
Does the Bush campaign pay you per post, troll?
*I dont support a candidate who has supported: Auto bailouts? Bank bailouts, the Stimulus package, Government-run healthcare, Progressive taxation and Hands off unfunded liabilities.*
But did he VOTE for any of this? Did he make any of this happen? So you would prefer we vote for someone who voted for all this crap vs someone who gave it lip service?
You sit down!