Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: tanknetter
There comes a point where the risk of major payouts as a result of a workplace violence incident outweigh the risk of a major payout from an EEO suit. When that point is reached it’s the least-worse option to fire the guy and write the EEO payout off as a cost of doing business.

No, not from a financial, PR, or insurance perspective, the rare outbreak of violence and the costs associated won't add up to more.
45 posted on 08/27/2015 8:34:16 AM PDT by TexasGunLover ("Either you're with us or you're with the terrorists."-- President George W. Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGunLover

I’m not sure thats right. Risk mitigation in this case always assumes worst-case scenarios. Which would be the deaths of multiple staff members at the hands of an employee known to staff and management, even documented, of having a history of violent outbursts.

Those sorts of payouts are going to exceed, far exceed, anything sort of EEO-related settlement.


54 posted on 08/27/2015 8:48:56 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson