Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dangus
Foreigners are subject to U.S. law while residing in the United States because the land they are on are the jurisdiction of the United States.

Once you grant that, the argument that "subject to its jurisdiction" does not apply to aliens is nonsensical. Of course they are subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Aliens (resident or illegal) who commit crimes can be prosecuted and incarcerated as with any U.S. citizen. The exception to this is foreign diplomats, for whom "diplomatic immunity" takes them outside of U.S. jurisdiction. This is consistent with the common law rule that said all children born within the jurisdiction of the sovereign -- even to alien parents -- were "natural born" subjects (or citizens, as the case may be).

40 posted on 08/27/2015 12:11:23 PM PDT by CpnHook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: CpnHook

>> Once you grant that, the argument that “subject to its jurisdiction” does not apply to aliens is nonsensical. Of course they are subject to U.S. jurisdiction. Aliens (resident or illegal) who commit crimes can be prosecuted and incarcerated as with any U.S. citizen. <<

No, the LAND they are ON is subject to its jurisdiction, so therefore are the CRIMES they commit ON that land.

Please read the article in its entirety before posting. I explain this in considerable depth:

Foreigners are subject to U.S. law while residing in the United States because the land they are on are the jurisdiction of the United States. But citizens are also the jurisdiction of the United States, not just land. Foreigners, even those in the United States, are only the jurisdiction of the United States where that jurisdiction has been granted by their home country under the terms of their entry.

If that sounds too abstract, let’s look at simple examples:

EXAMPLE 1: Joe is sent to war in Vietnam, and doesn’t return. Vietnam claims he is dead. Is he legally dead? Not until the United States declares him legally dead. He was in Vietnam, but he was under US jurisdiction, not Vietnamese.

EXAMPLE TWO: Bill sleeps with a sixteen-year-old while visiting Elbonia. Under Elbonian law, this is statutory rape. He is tried in Elbonia, not because HE is under Elbonian jurisdiction, but because he is on land within Elbonian jurisdiction.

EXAMPLE THREE: Elbonia passes a law granting divorce without spousal consent. Bob wants to divorce Maria. So he goes to Elbonia. But Elbonia will not grant him the divorce, because they respect that Bob is under American jurisdiction.

EXAMPLE FOUR: This gets tricky: Fatima is granted a divorce from Ali, and moves to America. She and her daughter become citizens, and convert to Christianity. Then Elbonistan rules that because she has become Christian, she loses custody rights. Both the U.S. and Elbonistan claim jurisdiction over Fatima’s daughter.


41 posted on 08/27/2015 12:40:36 PM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson