Glad you kept it unemotional.
You’ve precisely demonstrated the writer’s point.
Well, it’s mostly a good piece with some sound reasoning in it.
There may be a couple of mistakes though. For one, I do not believe that the GOP is waiting around endlessly to attack. I believe the GOP is conspiring and cooperating with democrats. I believe their goals are the same.
A second mistake is to assume that the other candidates can change their act and win me back.
They can’t.
There is simply no possible way. Speaking for myself, anyone even remotely associated or even suspected to be associated with the GOP is out. Just not even going to consider it, because they are all just a bunch of stinking liars.
And that includes Fiorina. She may not be a politician, but I suspect that she is a GOP plant, and I’m just not going to mess with her.
A third possible mistake, though I’m not sure it’s a mistake, is Carson.
I’m iffy on that if it’s a mistake, because he doesn’t have the fire in the belly that I’m looking for...buuuut, yes he seems like a good guy. Is it possible that i could consider him for VP...maaaaaybe. Dunno yet.
But I will go ahead and say Carson has a better shot than any of the GOP clones.
And yeah I’d say this writer probably has a better understanding of the dynamic that is occurring than anyone I’ve seen yet.
But I’m soured on the word “emotion”. The word pisses me off.
I think a better way to put it would be a “purity of balls” test.
Lol — exactly.
Greenfield has totally nailed it here.