Sure but there is a fundamental flaw with that argument. You are looking at this from what people want. I’m looking at this from what best advances the liberal agenda.
Advanced socialism, AKA communism, requires a Hillary at the helm. She’s bloodthirsty. Sanders and Fauxahontis are useful idiot types. Hillary will ‘rule’. They would ‘be ruled’. And the power structure of the world wants America ‘ruled’. Thus she remains viable until a more Putin like Dem emerges. Thats why Barry got the drooling sycophancy from world leaders. It was because he does what they want for us.
The libs on the ground may want sanders. When do useful idiots in a communist revolution ever get a say? The only say they get is “BUT I’M ON YOUR SIDE!!!” before being shot in the head by their leaders’ troops.
I’m not sure how that squares with Obama beating her. In the end, the dogs still have to eat it.
“When do useful idiots in a communist revolution ever get a say? The only say they get is “BUT I’M ON YOUR SIDE!!!” before being shot in the head by their leaders’ troops.”
It also reminds me how we had to vote for TRAITORS McCain and Romney....just a different party, same basic evil. I forgot McConnell. MAC must have laughed his arse off for a week.