Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: usurper
Once they reach the age of 23 they can then petition to have their parents immigrate lawfully as immediate relatives (IR-1). That is what this anchor baby thing is really about.

That's where the numbers (and the welfare benefits cost) pile up.

Howse about these questions for Boosh and Rubberio: Sir, would you be against deporting violent felons who happen to be the parent of an anchor baby or is "family reunification" more important?

Would you be against a 14th Amendment-compatible policy (under present day's tortured reading) of denying pregnant women visitors visas in order to prevent anchor baby skulduggery?

Maybe Ms. Me-Gyn can get to work on these.

50 posted on 08/26/2015 11:43:24 AM PDT by FirstFlaBn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: FirstFlaBn
Would you be against a 14th Amendment-compatible policy

Therein lies the real problem and it's going to be a continuous one until there is a major change of opinion in the republican ranks.

I generally listen to radio shows chock full of the republican analysts and taking heads..They appear to be 100% in agreement that the 14th amendment says that citizenship is a birthright in this country.

In my view they are 100% wrong, but they are unapologetic about it and think anyone with a contrarian view is a idiot.

52 posted on 08/26/2015 11:52:11 AM PDT by Cold Heat (For Rent....call 1-555-tagline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson