Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Colorado Republicans Cancel Presidential Poll at Caucuses (GOPe strikes back?)
ABC News ^ | 8/25/2015 | NICHOLAS RICCARDI

Posted on 08/26/2015 8:33:31 AM PDT by JediJones

The state party's executive committee voted Friday to eliminate the presidential preference poll held during the party's March caucuses. That means there will be no official count of who won that contest.

The vote was unanimous and drew little attention until it was reported by The Denver Post on Tuesday.

State GOP Chairman Steve House said the change was made in response to a new Republican National Committee rule that would have made the presidential preference poll binding.

The executive committee decided that would bring too much formality to the caucuses, which have drawn criticism in the past for being too easy for fringe candidates with small but motivated groups of supporters to overwhelm.

House acknowledged the party is essentially surrendering its early role in the presidential nominating contest.

"In this particular year, people are looking to (see) how can we be relevant if something unusual happens."

Colorado Democrats have made no changes to their March 1 caucuses, which still include a presidential preference poll.

(Excerpt) Read more at abcnews.go.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: caucus; colorado; gop; house; primary; randpaul; republican; rnc; stevehouse; trump
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last
To: dangus

Agreed that this rule from the national GOP seems good, but the problem here is Colorado trying to avoid the rule by eliminating a vote for the presidential nominee entirely. They are sacrificing the ability for their rank-and-file to vote for the purpose of allowing the potential hijacking of their delegates to take place.


21 posted on 08/26/2015 10:13:21 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

True. My point was that the national party actually (incredibly) gets that the 2012 primaries were a disaster.


22 posted on 08/26/2015 10:15:14 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: ballearthout

Agree. This type of thing is going to continue, to more and more states.

It’ll be interesting to see which folks here will support more of the GOPe backstabbing, just as long as it keeps Trump out. Talk about hypocrisy.


23 posted on 08/26/2015 10:18:36 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: dangus

They get that they were a disaster for Mitt. Every rule change was made looking at what would’ve helped Mitt sail through easier. That meant stopping Ron Paul’s shenanigans, making it easier for the candidate with the most money to sail through and arranging the primaries so that the conservative states have to split the delegates while the liberal states are winner-take-all.

Some of those steps, like drastically lowering the number of debates, have backfired because Trump turned out to be the big money candidate. Right now they would happily add on more debates so that they’d have more chances to knock Trump down without needing to spend money.


24 posted on 08/26/2015 10:23:08 AM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: duffee

“The GOP-E of Colorado knows what’s best for Colorado, Coloradans, and all Americans, legal and illegal, they’ve been told by Reince Prince and the RNC. Jeb Bush would approve of this comment”.

That’s exactly right. Not much different than Chicago or any other “machine”.

“Jeb Bush would approve of this comment”.

You sure nailed that, too.


25 posted on 08/26/2015 10:32:09 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

ping


26 posted on 08/26/2015 10:32:35 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
To clarify, their people WILL NOT vote on a candidate in the GOP primary. They will only select delegates who can vote for whoever they want. Their primary will not have a “winner” among the candidates because they won’t even have a vote on the candidates.

In a year like this one that is a dangerous game if they do betray the voters for the rino. The GOPe is playing at their demise if they betray voters.

27 posted on 08/26/2015 11:45:50 AM PDT by Lady Heron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

>> They get that they were a disaster for Mitt. Every rule change was made looking at what would’ve helped Mitt sail through easier. <<

That’s simply the opposite of reality. Paul stole elections from Romney’s strongest competitor, not Romney.

And requiring early states to split delegates prevents a plurality candidate disliked by the majority from winning those states outright. Delegates are always freed as the candidates drop out, so this will do little in helping an establishment candidate win some 2-candidate down-to-the-wire win. What it *will* do is make the delegate total more closely related to the popular vote, which will help a natural not-Romney win.


28 posted on 08/26/2015 11:47:23 AM PDT by dangus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

So it is worthless to vote in the primary this year since I currently live in Colorado?
This really is overboard.


29 posted on 08/26/2015 12:06:45 PM PDT by Verbosus (/* No Comment */)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Verbosus

You don’t get to vote for a presidential candidate at all. Apparently there is a delegate selection process you have to stick around for in the caucus that Ron Paul hijacked last time. All you can do this year in Colorado is try to select delegates who you think will back the candidate you like.


30 posted on 08/26/2015 12:24:08 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dangus

But they had to stop Paul from doing it this time in case it hurt their preferred candidate. Paul is just as interested in stealing from the GOPe’s choice as other insurgents.

The issue with the delegate-splitting is that almost all the conservative states come during the proportional period and almost all the blue liberal states come during winner-take-all. That means the states conservatives are likely to win will lose delegates to the runners-up, but the states RINOs are likely to win will get all the delegates, leaving nothing for the conservatives.

I expect if the schedule looked different, and conservative states were voting later more often, they would’ve kept them all proportional.


31 posted on 08/26/2015 12:30:31 PM PDT by JediJones (The #1 Must-see Filibuster of the Year: TEXAS TED AND THE CONSERVATIVE CRUZ-ADE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

It’s easier for the RNC to rig a Presidential prefence vote than a caucus vote for delegates. This will probably help Rand Paul in Colorado. If it comes down to a “brokered” convention, I’d expect the delegates to eventually go with Trump over Bush.


32 posted on 08/26/2015 12:43:02 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Fascinating. Now I’m not sure if I’m gonna bother to temporarily change registration from Libertarian back to Republican to try to get to State. Might anyway. Would be great if there WAS a war: I’m simply not someone who can be pressured.

Oh, and I’d go as a firebrand delegate to support Trump.


33 posted on 08/26/2015 1:01:48 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkpup

“Eliminating this poll should therefore result in a turnout that is about 1/4 of the usually dismal number. “

Indeed. But that should work in favor of activists trying to get to State. I’ve done that in the past and will try again. Oh, and my guy is Trump.


34 posted on 08/26/2015 1:08:00 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reno89519

From your mouth to God’s ear. I hate the fact we now have caucuses.


35 posted on 08/26/2015 1:11:01 PM PDT by Duchess47 ("One day I will leave this world and dream myself to Reality" Crazy Horse)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

You should probably make your decision pretty soon. Most state parties have a requirement that you’ve been a registered Republican for X amount of time if you want to be a delegate.


36 posted on 08/26/2015 1:37:04 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

Looks like it’s 60 days in Colorado and the Pub caucus is 2/2/15.


37 posted on 08/26/2015 2:02:22 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: catnipman

The sooner the better. I don’t know much about Colorado, but I know that in 2012 and 2008 , many state GOPs would play games like intentionally using older membership lists to keep out Ron Paul delegates/voters — even when they had technically been members long enough.

Based on reports from Virginia and the Carolinas, the RNC is instructing state GOPs to use dirty tricks against the Trump campaign this cycle.


38 posted on 08/26/2015 3:41:34 PM PDT by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: laplata; MileHi; dynachrome; Balata; bboop; Benito Cereno; BulletBobCo; Carley; ColoCowgirl; ...

Colorado Ping ( Let me know if you wish to be added or removed from the list.)


39 posted on 08/26/2015 5:17:20 PM PDT by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

The primaries were the only reason that I can think of to stay with the GOP. It may be time to change my registration. I will not, under any circumstances vote for Bush. It ain’t happenin! If nobody shows up for third party, the Dems get my vote this time. If there is no real, conservative leadership this time around it will be time to flush it and start over anyway.


40 posted on 08/26/2015 9:26:02 PM PDT by Colorado Doug (Now I know how the Indians felt to be sold out for a few beads and trinkets)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson