Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Olog-hai
From the story:

"In general, journalists are civilians," the 1,180 page manual says, but it adds that "journalists may be members of the armed forces, persons authorized to accompany the armed forces, or unprivileged belligerents."

A person deemed "unprivileged belligerent" is not entitled to the rights afforded by the Geneva Convention so a commander could restrict from certain coverage areas or even hold indefinitely without charges any reporter considered an "unprivileged belligerent."

The manual adds, "Reporting on military operations can be very similar to collecting intelligence or even spying. A journalist who acts as a spy may be subject to security measures and punished if captured." It is not specific as to the punishment or under what circumstances a commander can decide to "punish" a journalist.

Now most of us think read this as if a normal government wrote this. We say to ourselves, Great, that means that reporters who give away friendly positions or friendly plans can be treated as the spies.

We fail to recognize that this was written by the Øbama Regime.

The way I read this is that bloggers who expose Obama's efforts against the American People can be disappeared indefinitely. Bloggers who whistle-blow can be disappeared.

Remember that NSA is part of the DoD.

8 posted on 08/26/2015 2:39:12 AM PDT by markomalley (Nothing emboldens the wicked so greatly as the lack of courage on the part of the good -- Leo XIII)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: markomalley

Seems to me it’s a military policy concerning reporting on military operations. We already follow the LLSS rule here.

“Reporting on military operations can be very similar to collecting intelligence or even spying. A journalist who acts as a spy...”

Insurgent + video recorder is still an insurgent. Many Western reporters think it’s Che-Chic to support insurgents providing them with operational information.

This is long overdue.


9 posted on 08/26/2015 2:57:28 AM PDT by Justa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: markomalley

I’m reading this a bit more broadly.

ANYONE who has a camera or is recording something on a battlefield can be “held as a belligerent.” Since battlefield tactics have often led to American jurisprudence in law enforcement, it’s only a matter of time before the person recording a police stop or an unlawful search can be “held as a belligerent.”


15 posted on 08/26/2015 4:03:57 AM PDT by rarestia (It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson