Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Have you come up with a rationalization to do away with Cruz’s waffling, pandering performance on Megan Kelly’s show last night?

First, Cruz, who is touted as an expert on the Constitution, tried to portray those who believe the 14th amendment mandates birthright citizenship, have legitimacy.

Next, when asked a direct question about deporting children of illegal aliens, if he were president, he refused to answer the question, after repeated promptings. His non-answer, is, of course, his answer. He would not.


65 posted on 08/26/2015 4:47:25 AM PDT by odawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: odawg

yeah it was a bad interview for Cruz.. he answered that like most politicians.. a non answer then tried to divert to something else.. kind of like Walker trying to decide what is the best PC answer to the anchor baby question


66 posted on 08/26/2015 4:54:29 AM PDT by Lib-Lickers 2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

To: odawg; Cincinatus' Wife

The question was posed as if the President will go down and say “deport this one” and “not that one” individually. The question was foolishly hypothetical. Any discussion of deportation UNTIL the border is secure is total waste of time.

How can I say that? Easy. First is common sense, but second is Kate Steinle’s murderer....who had been deported 5 or 6 times - I can’t remember - meaning he had crossed the border illegally at least 6-7 times. Thus, deportation before the border is secure is a damned waste of time and a fools errand.


67 posted on 08/26/2015 4:54:44 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson