Not quite. The temperament part was mentioned, but then the final question was what I said, how will he respond to the war on women accusation.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Y9_LJj7A68
Nevertheless, the way that the question was asked made it ABUNDANTLY CLEAR Kelly was LEGITIMIZING the question. It was not unlike the "Some Say..." that journalists use to ask biased questions with an attempt at plausible deniability.
Hey, you have a right to your opinion that it was a fair, tough question. But I vehemently disagree, and from the evidence I've seen the majority of viewers side with me on this one.
It's been, what, a couple of weeks now, and I'm still FURIOUS with Kelly. She used to be my favorite journalist, and now I can't stand the sight of her.
And the funny thing is, I'm pretty neutral about Trump. There's things I like about him, but I have tons of reservations, chief of which is that I don't like his chances in the general election.
So to me, it's not that she went after Trump. It's that her attack was so clearly motivated by self-aggrandizement and was so dishonest. There are few things more despicable than trying to destroy a person's reputation, and I believe she did it out of greed, not ideological differences with the man.