Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ted Cruz TRUMPS Megyn Kelly on unfair question, says ‘I’m not playing the media’s game’
The Right Scoop ^ | 8/25/15 | staff

Posted on 08/25/2015 7:14:01 PM PDT by VinL

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 next last
To: Taliesan
Trump changes as the misc candidates drop out and his gap in the polls begins to close. As the race for the nomination tightens he’ll become a poll watcher and start modulating his answers to questions. In the end, he’ll be talking just like the centrist Democrat that he is. He’ll eventually contradict everything he’s saying right now that the red-meat eaters are loving. Watch and see it happen.

Disagree. If Trump backtracks on the wall, H1-B visas or deporting illegal alien felons, he won't have a chance. The Folks will see it as an unforgivable betrayal.

And btw, Jeb Bush is already sounding like a centrist Democrat. I would hate to see what left of THAT gets us. you need to start getting that this Dem-Rep paradigm is killing us. We all rallied to capture the Senate, and then the ones we funded, went door-to-door for, and voted in droves to elect simply handed the keys to Obama and Reid. Even so-called conservatives like Jodi Ernst and Ted Cruz betrayed us on key votes.

221 posted on 08/26/2015 5:53:45 AM PDT by montag813 (Bring Back Tar and Feathers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: odawg
The 14th amendment was to protect former slaves only, as per the drafters of the amendment.

No disagreement on the primary intent, but it says what it says. If they had had today's problems it would almost certainly say something different.

222 posted on 08/26/2015 5:58:21 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Thanks for the OANN info :)


223 posted on 08/26/2015 6:08:11 AM PDT by Jane Long ("And when thou saidst, Seek ye my face; my heart said unto thee, Thy face, LORD, will I seek")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: editor-surveyor
Wow another liar!

I wouldn't go that far, but Cruz did seem to prevaricate rather than answer Kelly's question about the practical effect of revoking birth right citizenship in a straightforward manner.

He seems to have reversed his position on the constitutional issue as well.

Mistake’ for Conservatives to Try to End Birthright Citizenship

224 posted on 08/26/2015 6:09:25 AM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck; editor-surveyor

Ted never reversed his position. He just made a list of priorities.

The video you linked to was taken out of context in that new statutes that bar birthright citizenship would be weak before the SCOTUS. That is correct. SCOTUS won’t be bowed by arguments, they will be bowed by politics.

Ted clarifies it here (time 1:05):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iWWwb6fmb8M

Ted supports amending the US Constitution but feels it will take too long. He says making the border secure should be priority one. He’s absolutely right.


225 posted on 08/26/2015 6:28:42 AM PDT by Hostage (ARTICLE V)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Read Write Repeat
Cruz [...] is given multiple opportunities to walk back his H1B visa 500% expansion and doesn’t do it.

Not only hasn't he walked it back, on July 7 he doubled down:

Cruz: ‘Proud to Defend’ Trump, Expand H-1B Visas For ‘Educated,’ ‘Talented’ Job Creators - http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3309118/posts

226 posted on 08/26/2015 6:35:57 AM PDT by ConservingFreedom (a "guest worker" is a stateless person with no ties to any community, only to his paymaster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: Catsrus

Right.


227 posted on 08/26/2015 6:58:18 AM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

I very much appreciate your assessment and the research information on FOX. I knew none of that. Thank you for the reply! Rita


228 posted on 08/26/2015 7:56:43 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 212 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

Hey, thanks.

BFL


229 posted on 08/26/2015 7:57:58 AM PDT by RitaOK ( VIVA CRISTO REY / Public education is the farm team for more Marxists coming)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Not just a troll but now a clown.

You’ve expanded yourself.

Congratulations Mr. No-info unqualified voter.
.


230 posted on 08/26/2015 8:11:47 AM PDT by editor-surveyor (Freepers: Not as smart as I'd hoped they'd be)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: VinL
Right, and so how many hypotheticals does that beget?

Irrelevant. The answer to the basic question is simple: Deport the illegal parents and the minor anchor babies go with them. We will not separate families. If minor children have some legal relative in the US, the might be allowed to stay. Otherwise, minor children stay with the parents.

All those rare cases you throw out do not change the fundamental policy that would cover 98% or more of cases. Such cases would be reviewed individually.

“Look, everyone agrees with should secure the border— and in that we’re in agreement, let’s do that first. After that’s done, we can discuss the rest.”

Cruz doesn't think the USA can walk and chew chewing gum at the same time? Build the wall and begin law enforcement concurrently. Actually, the enforcement can begin the first day we have a president who will enforce the law. The wall would require some funding, and maybe legislation depending whether the Secure Fence Act of 2006 is still in effect except for funding.

231 posted on 08/26/2015 10:07:55 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies]

To: ConservingFreedom

That’s a very informative thread.


232 posted on 08/26/2015 11:37:29 AM PDT by Read Write Repeat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 226 | View Replies]

To: Will88

Irrelevant. The answer to the basic question is simple: Deport the illegal parents and the minor anchor babies go with them.
*********

The children are Americans— now, Will88 will deport American citizens?

Please tell me what percentage of the American electorate do you believe will support your position? Give me a number, I’m curious?


233 posted on 08/26/2015 12:51:58 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: VinL
The children are Americans— now, Will88 will deport American citizens?

We deport illegal alien parents. If the parents leave their anchor babies in the US, then that's the parents decision to separate their families.

Let it sink into your thick head. We are not required by law to allow illegal aliens to remain in the US because they have an anchor baby. The parents are responsible for their children. Take them with them to their home country, or make other arrangements.

The parents created the situation for their anchor babies, not the US government or its citizens.

You sure like to use emotional, leftist tactics,

234 posted on 08/26/2015 12:58:14 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 233 | View Replies]

To: Will88

So, you’ve changed your position. Now the children can stay, right?? So, what now— they have to become wards of the state for the next 18 years????


235 posted on 08/26/2015 1:05:11 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 234 | View Replies]

To: VinL; Will88

Learn to read with comprehension Vin...the children are the parents concern not the US government’s.


236 posted on 08/26/2015 2:15:43 PM PDT by mac_truck (Aide toi et dieu t aidera)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: mac_truck

Ms. Kelly didn’t take a long enough vacation. She should be ashamed of herself for not knowing the difference between covering a story (that Trump was killing the numbers at the GOP start) with covering herself! Ailes thinks she is the best ever. She is....just ask her!!!


237 posted on 08/26/2015 2:22:41 PM PDT by cousair
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: VinL
So, you’ve changed your position. Now the children can stay, right?? So, what now— they have to become wards of the state for the next 18 years????

Haven't changed anything. You're really making yourself look bad. My first suggestion of how the question could be answered, from my #231.

Irrelevant. The answer to the basic question is simple: Deport the illegal parents and the minor anchor babies go with them. We will not separate families.If minor children have some legal relative in the US, they might be allowed to stay. Otherwise, minor children stay with the parents.

If everyone is as weak as you, and possibly even Cruz, on this issue, then we'll never have the will to enforce immigration law. The people who've come here illegally created their own circumstances. They made their own bed.

238 posted on 08/26/2015 2:22:59 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 235 | View Replies]

To: Will88

So, if the parents leave their kids in America, the kids can stay with full rights and benefits of any other American citizen? That’s your position, right?


239 posted on 08/26/2015 2:39:46 PM PDT by VinL (It is better to suffer every wrong, then to consent to wrong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: VinL
So, if the parents leave their kids in America, the kids can stay with full rights and benefits of any other American citizen? That’s your position, right?

Enough of your silly games and inconsistencies. Anyone can spin one scenario after another, but you've been unsuccessful in trying to spin away from the basic situation that exists with illegal aliens.

Refresh your memory, or maybe you missed this famous case.

The woman who became the unofficial face of the millions of illegal immigrants striving to remain in the United States has been deported to her native Mexico almost a year to the day after she took refuge in a church in Chicago.

She is said to have asked the arresting officers to give her some time with her son to calm him down before she was taken away. While his mother was sent overnight to Tijuana in Mexico, Saul remains in Chicago under the guardianship of members of the Adalberto United Methodist church where the two had been living over the past year.

Mexican mother who hid in Chicago church deported

Yes, we can deport an illegal mother and her anchor baby. Saul Arellano was able to stay in the US with a legal guardian. There has just been very little immigration law enforcement.

Stop wasting your time and everyone else's who might still be reading.

240 posted on 08/26/2015 3:05:47 PM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 181-200201-220221-240241-255 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson