Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SuzyQue
"I had two brothers who were there. It was definitely not an after the fact story."

It has nothing to do with being there.

The idea that the Iraq invasion was only about Iraqi WMDs was promoted after the fact. That is a fact. Before the invasion there were a number of reasons given for doing it. So much so that Bush was criticized by the press for not focusing on a single compelling reason.

When they decided to go to the UN, they had to decide how to make the case, and for the purposes of UN buy-in they made a decision to only focus on the WMDs. That was a conscious decision, covered in the press at the time. That can only be a decision if there were other reasons too, which there were.

Since then people have acted like WMDs were the whole story, but it never was. Just because that was the focus of the UN presentation doesn't mean the other reasons went away.

93 posted on 08/25/2015 11:57:43 AM PDT by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]


To: mlo

Nope. The WMDs were indeed promoted at the time. Were you perhaps watching CNN? That would explain why you weren’t aware.

I do agree that WMDs were not the whole story, and in retrospect, it wasn’t a great idea to go in.


121 posted on 08/25/2015 12:39:26 PM PDT by SuzyQue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson