Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: glennaro
Trump doesn't need the "hispanic" vote and he won't get the "hispanic" vote.

Wrong. You need about 40% of Hispanic votes to win. Blowing off 17% of the population is not a winning strategy.

57 posted on 08/25/2015 7:49:57 AM PDT by Starstruck (I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: Starstruck

If you get 100% of the white vote you win. Stick your race politics up your burrito.


65 posted on 08/25/2015 7:51:43 AM PDT by central_va (I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck

“Wrong. You need about 40% of Hispanic votes to win. Blowing off 17% of the population is not a winning strategy.”

You can easily make up for not getting Hispanic votes by getting the white votes that stayed home for McAmnesy and Romney.


76 posted on 08/25/2015 7:59:54 AM PDT by Hardens Hollow (Couldn't find Galt's Gulch, so created our own Harden's Hollow to quit paying the fascist beast.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck
Wrong. You need about 40% of Hispanic votes to win. Blowing off 17% of the population is not a winning strategy.

I agree that what you say should be true, but it's not.

I recall listening to a recent analysis of the last three or four presidential elections that reported that even with an extraordinary (i.e., unachievable) shift in the number of "hispanic" votes from Democrat to Republican (something like going from 25% to 70%), the GOP candidate still would not have prevailed in even the closest election; and that but a minor percentage increase in conservative votes (from those who stayed home rather than vote for yet another GOPE/RINO) would have changed the electoral result. (I'm not making this up and will post the link to the study as soon as I can get to it.)

The point is that most "hispanics" who fled their sewer of a country to come here (legal and illegal since both types apparently are able to vote in our elections) didn't do so because they hate their socialist government, but because there's far more "free stuff" to be had here ... paid for, of course, by the far greater number of taxpayers -- that is, productive citizens -- in this country than in "hispania".

102 posted on 08/25/2015 9:08:33 AM PDT by glennaro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck
Wrong. You need about 40% of Hispanic votes to win.

No. You merely need a bigger white voter turn out and a higher percentage of the white vote. What you do is use the border wall and illegal immigrant crime as a wedge issue to get the white vote out.

Blowing off 17% of the population is not a winning strategy.

Blowing off 77% of the population(whites) is an even Less winning strategy.

104 posted on 08/25/2015 9:18:10 AM PDT by SmokingJoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

To: Starstruck
Trump doesn't need the "hispanic" vote and he won't get the "hispanic" vote.

Wrong. You need about 40% of Hispanic votes to win. Blowing off 17% of the population is not a winning strategy.


The "Hispanic" vote is not the same population as a poll sample of illegal alien "Hispanic" people.

La Raza primarily represents hostile, racist, criminal, illegal alien invaders.

Under current law, non-citizens are not allowed to vote in federal elections, and it is a federal crime for a non-citizen to vote or register to vote in such an election, punishable by imprisonment and/or the initiation of removal proceedings against that individual.[1]
118 posted on 08/25/2015 10:31:48 AM PDT by meadsjn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson