Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cboldt

Boy did you miss my point. If they apply the meaning as merely being on our soil, then it is better NOT TO have that language.


15 posted on 08/24/2015 6:57:12 AM PDT by Mr. K (If it is HilLIARy -vs- Jeb! then I am writing-in Palin/Cruz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Mr. K
-- If they apply the meaning as merely being on our soil, then it is better NOT TO have that language. --

The way I read Wong Kim Ark, the courts have decided to interpret the language as meaning merely being on our soil, and the "subject to the jurisdiction" clause is read to exclude persons having diplomatic immunity.

I would add that being a law breaker would reinforce the court's opinion that those here illegally are subject to the jurisdiction.

25 posted on 08/24/2015 7:39:31 AM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson