Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: T-Bird45

It poisons the well right out the gate, like their gambit of calling us racists when they are losing the argument on merit. And that’s most of the time, like here.

I’m not buying it. Something isn’t right. It smells like public relations.
As a categorical matter—something we all know—women are not the physical equals of men.
They want to fly, supply, rear echelon—more power to ‘em.

But Rangers? C’mon. Next we’re going to hear someone assuring us some girls passed SEAL testing. No way. Not unless they’re trannies on steroids.

But hey, don’t wanna hate on diversity. So yeah, rah rah rah!


30 posted on 08/21/2015 9:01:33 PM PDT by tumblindice (America's founding fathers: all armed conservatives.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: tumblindice

Woman collectively are not the physical equals of men. However, some women, individually, come damn close. These 2 clearly do.

As long as they can pass the standard, and the standard is NOT adjusted, I don’t have a problem with it. If they can do the job, let them.


67 posted on 08/21/2015 10:55:08 PM PDT by bigdaddy45
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

To: tumblindice

A vast majority of the military is simply an affirmative action PC, PR campaign anymore. God forbid we have to fight a well equipped army at some point. Could you imagine China with a three hundred ship navy?

I know China imagines it. How inclusive will their army be with 45 million more men than women in their country?


73 posted on 08/22/2015 12:50:33 AM PDT by Jim from C-Town (The government is rarely benevolent, often malevolent and never benign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson