Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Chode
Exactly.

There were two things about this article that made me think this is not the dispassionate observation of an objective observer:

1.) Referring to people who disagree as "plethora of haters". That is the way liberals talk.

2.) Referring to the females as "studs". I cannot imagine why a man would refer to a woman as a stud in any description, even colloquial usage. Again, just to show how "equal" males and females are.

On an additional note, the segregation of facilities, and someone to watch over things to ensure nothing untoward happened. As if it won't, and having an assignment to do that. Are they going to add that to the watch list each day, who gets assigned that duty? This was the segment:

"...I quickly found, however, that the gender issue was a non-issue. The barracks at Camp Rogers are shaped like a ‘U’, with a latrine and shower facilities forming the center of the U, connecting two long bays of bunk beds and wall lockers, with doors at the end of the bays. The female students in our company slept towards one end of the bay, where an enclave of wall lockers formed an area for them to hurriedly change in when the need arose. In the latrines, during the absurdly short time hacks we were given to use the bathroom, the women simply walked past the men and used the stalls. After the first real smoke session of the week on day one, nobody cared much about using the same latrine. We were all just Ranger students. (shades of GI Jane here)

During the few times we were able to take showers, the cadre dedicated the showers on one side of the bay to female students for one quarter of the shower period, and a Ranger instructor and female NCO stood in the center of the ‘U’ to avoid confusion..."

To avoid "confusion". Got it.

104 posted on 08/22/2015 7:05:24 AM PDT by rlmorel ("National success by the Democratic Party equals irretrievable ruin." Ulysses S. Grant)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: rlmorel

‘2.) Referring to the females as “studs”. I cannot imagine why a man would refer to a woman as a stud in any description, even colloquial usage. Again, just to show how “equal” males and females are.’

The article reads like it was written by a peevish queen. Note the name for down the road. I strongly suspect the author is a Theban Sacred Band type. The site it comes from has whiffs of it too.


136 posted on 08/22/2015 5:02:53 PM PDT by Psalm 144 (The mill grinds exceedingly fine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson