Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife

It doesn’t take a “plan” for employers to give employees comp time voluntarily—they are already free to do that.

It only takes a government plan if you’re going to mandate it—which is exactly what I responded to. The details (e.g., easing or exempting the requirement for a certain size of smaller business) doesn’t really make a difference (other than being unfair, giving businesses an incentive not to grow, and imposing the burden on somewhat fewer employers.)


12 posted on 08/21/2015 4:24:32 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

WALKER: “...... But I’d rather go in the other direction, the direction of greater flexibility, to allow “comp time” instead of overtime — if the employee wants it......


14 posted on 08/21/2015 4:25:55 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: 9YearLurker

—they are already free to do that.

—Comp time is more regulation.

Hmmm, you have the whole thing backward

Thus, to answer your question, you are not permitted to use comp time for a nonexempt employee who works more than 40 hours in a single workweek. That is true even if the employee requests or expresses a desire to waive overtime pay in lieu of comp time. Only public-sector employers are allowed to provide comp time to nonexempt employees.

http://www.hrhero.com/hl/articles/2013/04/23/comp-time-not-an-option-for-private-employers/

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/wage-hour-laws-faq-29118-4.html


49 posted on 08/22/2015 5:06:28 AM PDT by sgtyork (Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson