Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter
Folks reading this shouldn't be down on Cruz without at least watching the brief video at the source in which Cruz clearly explains himself. He's certainly not in favor of birthright citizenship, but he's in favor of the Constitution and he doesn't think birthright citizenship can be overturned absent a constitutional amendment. Rather than spend present efforts on the difficult amendment process he'd rather close the border: if the illegals can't get in they can't produce anchor babies!

Whether birthright citizenship could be overturned by a simple act of Congress is presently best described as a controversial legal position. There are respected legal minds on both sides. Personally I think its possible, but Ted tactically doesn't want pursuit of that to detract from getting the wall done.

28 posted on 08/20/2015 5:09:10 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer (Obama been Liberal. Hope Change)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: JohnBovenmyer
As long as he's agreed that the 14th amendment needs clarification to prevent its further abuse.

There are plenty who arrange travel plans to be here - legally - when they deliver their babies, Its called birth tourism and a wall won't stop it.

30 posted on 08/20/2015 5:13:13 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson