Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: elcid1970

Lincoln really meant his “with charity for all, with malice towards none” line from his second innaugural.

Not only would the post-war occupation been milder with Lincoln, the lack of an assasinated President would have robbed the Radicals of a martyr for which to punish the South into subservience.


28 posted on 08/20/2015 10:54:41 AM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: tanknetter

I agree that Lincoln meant to end the “late unpleasantness” as quickly as possible. But if he had lived, would he have been allowed to? Lincoln becomes the great President only after he was assassinated (much like JFK, but his legacy seems to be diminishing). He was able to run the war effort in his role as Commander-in-Chief, but I seriously doubt that Congress would have let him run the peace effort.

‘Ifs’ are great fun in history. If Lincoln had lived, how would we perceive him today? Especially if he had been politically neutered by Congress in his last term.


32 posted on 08/20/2015 11:34:55 AM PDT by hanamizu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson