Replies

http://www.denverpost.com/business/ci_28670015/platte-river-networks-clinton-e-mail-server-was

Private e-mail servers are unusual because they carry greater risks of getting hacked, said Scott W. Burt, president and CEO of Integro, a Denver e-mail management company.

“There are a lot of people you could hire, and they would set up (an e-mail server) and run it. That’s not hard. But there’s no real reason to do that,” Burt said. “The main motivator is you’re nervous about what is in your e-mail. It’s a control thing.”

Boian said Platte River had nothing to do with Clinton’s private home server.

Platte River, which submitted a bid for the e-mail job, stepped in four months after Clinton left the secretary job on Feb. 1, 2013, and three months after Sidney Blumenthal, a former Clinton White House staffer, reported that his e-mail account had been hacked, exposing messages sent to Clinton.

“We were literally hired in June 2013,” Boian said, “and because we use industry best practices, we had (Clinton’s) server moved to a data center in New Jersey. It remained in that spot until last week,” when the FBI picked it up Aug. 12.

Platte River also is not in possession of any Clinton e-mail backups, he said.

“The role of Platte River Networks was to upgrade, secure and manage the e-mail server for both the Clintons and their staff beginning June 2013. Platte River Networks is not under investigation. We were never under investigation. And we will fully comply with the FBI,” he said.

http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/politics/denver-based-platte-river-networks-questioned-by-us-senate-over-hillary-clinton-email-server

The U.S. Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs has given Platte River Networks until Tuesday to answer very specific questions about how that server was maintained.

In a letter to Platte River Networks CEO, Treve Suazo, the committee wants to know the following:

Please produce all documents and communications between or among employees or contractors of Platte River Networks and employees of the State Department referring or relating to Platte River Networks’ work related to Secretary Clinton’s private server.

Please produce all documents and communications between or among employees or contractors of Platte River Networks and Secretary Clinton or any representative of the Clinton family or Clinton Foundation referring or relating to Secretary Clinton’s private server.

Please produce all contracts between Platte River Networks, Secretary Clinton, the State Department, or any other party referring or relating to Platte River Networks’ work related to Secretary Clinton’s private server.

Please produce all invoices, bills, and receipts prepared by Platte River Networks or its representatives or agents regarding Platte River Networks’ work related to Secretary Clinton’s private server.

Was Platte River Networks ever made aware that the information on Secretary Clinton’s private server may contain classified or sensitive security data? If so, how did Platte River Networks learn about the classified or sensitive information? Please explain.

Is Platte River Networks authorized to maintain or access classified information? Please explain.

Did any employee of Platte River Networks receive training in the handling of classified information as it relates to Platte River Networks’ work on Secretary Clinton’s private server?

Did any employee of Platte River Networks receive training on preserving federal records pursuant to the Federal Records Act of 1950 as it relates to Platte River Networks’ work on Secretary Clinton’s private server?

Thanks for information. Looks like a good strategy.

They have until Tuesday to answer these questions. What year? They will never answer before the next election cycle. Clinton Foundation bought the Server(s) and is involved in this entire mess. Anyone at the Foundation had access to Classified info. The gov’t investigators are tripping over their own feet to avoid investigating anything.. It is all delay and whitewash.

Check out article and # 74.

Thanks, Maggie.

A previous employee of Platte River said they didn’t even have an alarm for the office. Interesting how the company went from 8 employees in a 2nd floor apartment to 30 employees and held an open house in June for their new building. That’s almost a good as cattle futures.

To add to your questions, did the Platte employees who could access the server have the requisite security clearances and need-to-know for the information on the server?

By the way, if you think you need to have physical access to the server to mine the information on it, you are mistaken. It can all be done remotely.