Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Anitius Severinus Boethius
Well Jim, that's what most people on this board have been saying for over a week now. A 10% tax on wire transfers to Mexico for a limited term, let's say five years, would more than pay for the construction of the wall.

Or would push Mexicans to use other means (Bitcoin, black market means, etc.) to transfer funds back to Mexico. A 10% tax would alter behavior, no doubt.

12 posted on 08/20/2015 7:24:43 AM PDT by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: Conscience of a Conservative

This argument makes no sense whatsoever. You know why Mexican nationals use Western Union? Because it is simple, easy, and most of all safe.

Do you think that these people would rather risk all of the money on a black market solution instead of knowing it will cost them an additional 10% through Western Union?

Even if they understood Bitcoin and how to transfer it, do you think that their family in Mexico would understand it and trust it?

No. It’s a ridiculous idea that Western Union would suddenly lose all of it’s business from Mexicans who trust it and know it.

It’s like the same claim that if gas goes much higher then Americans will drive less. There might be a slight modification of behavior, but it won’t be significant.


18 posted on 08/20/2015 7:29:18 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: Conscience of a Conservative

Black market means yes, bitcoins no. Too complicated for them.


23 posted on 08/20/2015 7:30:45 AM PDT by skippyjonjones
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson