“We don’t know, since they don’t name the place. It’s a private institution; in a free country they’d be free to set their own standards for acceptance. Frankly, this whole thing smells like manufactured controversy to me.”
Kinda like a Christian Baker who was a “private institution” who refused service to someone???? YET and here is the YET their names were named, they were drug in the court system, they were bullied and threatened by a certain, co called minority group that is NOT disabled.
The point of this article is that this child was not allowed into the school yet the media does not cover it because she is Down Syndrome. When the local station does cover it they do not tell you the dance company.
Had this child be denied because she was LGBT or whatever, we would know the name of the dance company and all involved.
As I recall, most folks on this forum supported the baker.
they were bullied and threatened by a certain, co called minority group that is NOT disabled.
They were bullied, threatened, and sued by militant queers.
the media does not cover it because she is Down Syndrome.
Big Media is loaded with queers and abortionists. Hence they flack for queers ... if they had their way, ALL Down Syndrome kids would be killed in utero. See my comment #12. Their attitude is straight out of Planned Parenthood and the Third Reich.
Oh, yes ... the sodomites vs. Christian bakers controversy was also contrived. By the sodomites.
And the dance company would be sued out of existence.