Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Pecos

Well, another option is that some emails SHOULD have had those markings before they were sent from or to her.


10 posted on 08/19/2015 4:39:34 AM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: ConservativeMind

I strongly believe that the professional originator of the material DID mark it properly, but that those markings were removed by a Hillary staffer before re-transmittal to her unsecured server. As SecState, neither she nor her staff members had the authority to remove the classifications determined by the originator, which may have revealed “means and methods”.


41 posted on 08/27/2015 4:29:11 AM PDT by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: ConservativeMind

Based on personal experience, the technical personnel who generated the data DID mark it appropriately. Therefore, one or more of Hillary’s staff members are guilty of removing the identifying marks.


42 posted on 09/01/2015 8:51:55 AM PDT by Pecos (What we obtain too cheap, we esteem too lightly.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson