More about that 1982 *footnote by Brennen. So we no more than court “dicta” as in not binding to the subsequent case as legal precedent? LoL. Trump should easily brush aside this nonsense.
- - - - - -
“Justice Brennan’s Footnote Gave Us Anchor Babies | Human Events”
http://humanevents.com/2010/08/04/justice-brennans-footnote-gave-us-anchor-babies/
“In fact, this alleged right derives only from a footnote slyly slipped into a Supreme Court opinion by Justice Brennan in 1982. You might say it snuck in when no one was looking, and now we have to let it stay. ...
And then, out of the blue in 1982, Justice Brennan slipped a footnote into his 5-4 opinion in Plyler v. Doe, asserting that no plausible distinction with respect to Fourteenth Amendment jurisdiction can be drawn between resident aliens whose entry into the United States was lawful, and resident aliens whose entry was unlawful. (Other than the part about one being lawful and the other not.)
Brennans authority for this lunatic statement was that it appeared in a 1912 book written by Clement L. Bouve. (Yes, THE Clement L. Bouve the one youve heard so much about over the years.) Bouve was not a senator, not an elected official, certainly not a judge just some guy who wrote a book.
So on one hand we have the history, the objective, the authors intent and 100 years of history of the 14th Amendment, which says that the 14th Amendment does not confer citizenship on children born to illegal immigrants.”
bookmark.