Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xzins

Clearly illegal immigration has been revealed to be a big issue in politics, and not in the way the media expected it to. So why don’t we just amend the Constitution and be done with it? Why settle for something less, something than can be twisted or interpreted differently?

We have enough States to ratify this change, so let’s just do it and stop trying to dwell in the nuances of a particular phrase.


52 posted on 08/18/2015 7:38:14 AM PDT by Anitius Severinus Boethius (www.wilsonharpbooks.com - Sign up for my new release e-mail and get my first novel for free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]


To: Anitius Severinus Boethius

I’m not arguing against an amendment, but I am saying that an amendment is not the only avenue.

IIRC, an amendment is a 75% vote of the states after a 2/3rds vote of the Congress. On the other hand, with legislation, Even when over-riding a veto, it’s only a 2/3rds vote. If there’s a President Trump/Cruz, the threshold would be 3/5ths, if there’s a recalcitrant Senate, or if nuked, just a majority.


59 posted on 08/18/2015 7:42:43 AM PDT by xzins (Don't let others pay your share; reject Freep-a-Fare! Donate-https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson