Posted on 08/17/2015 7:41:03 PM PDT by nhwingut
Fox News host Dana Perino said during The Five Monday that she would love to see co-host Jesse Watters personally enforce what she called an asinine immigration policy he endorsed on the program.
Watters and said that he was a fan of presidential candidate Donald Trumps immigration plan, adding that it would perhaps be a good idea for the real estate tycoon to offer amnesty to those who went down to the border and helped him build his wall.
Perino contended on the program that Trumps plan was not feasible, also criticizing the candidate for saying he would revoke the Dream Act.
She then issued a challenge to Watters and another co-host.
I would love to see you and you have to go find some families and round them up and say, Sorry, I know youve been here and your kids were born in the Bronx, but youre from Costa Rica and youre out of here, Perino told Watters and another co-host. I would love to see you two go out and have to do that.
(Excerpt) Read more at theblaze.com ...
I like that force multiplication...
I do think immigration enforcement needs to be paired with welfare repeal. Americans won’t take the illegals’ former jobs if the government keeps paying them not to work.
She’s been outed for a long time. Especially when she openly hoped the Supreme Court would approve homosexual marriage and that everyone would roll over and never campaign against it again.
I cant think of any of the Bush WH alumni who are not squishes.
********************
Amb. John Bolton, VP Cheney, AG Gonzalez, SoS Condi Rice come to mind, but I can’t recall names of others in the Admin. at this time.
I forgot that Dana Perino is another self-absorbed snarky, snotty, FAUX beauty bimbo just like her vacationing(?) co-worker.
They’ve always been there. They’re just being EXPOSED all over the place.
Hey Dana, you didn’t see me, but I was flipping you off from my couch.
How did she get on Fox with that attitude about getting something
done is beyond me. She should be huddled in a closet sucking her thumb.
...11 million illegal aliens.
*********************************
Damn! I’m really tiring of hearing that repeated by every talking head on TV! (NOT ranting to you, glabbe)
That’s the number that was being used around 2003. Does everyone believe that number of illegals has not grown in the past 12 years? .....The real number of illegals is probably now closer to 20 million!
Secure the border. Change the law that requires each illegal to get a court hearing before deportation. Give Border Patrol same power as ICE regarding detention and deportation decisions. Fine and imprison employers of illegals. ....Put the criminal illegals on ships from the Gulf of Mexico and drop them off at Tierra del Fuego! Send the non-criminal illegals to their own countries and reduce foreign aid to those countries by x$ per deportee.
Guess I was a little harsh there, but I’m really fed up!
How did she get on Fox with that attitude about getting something done is beyond me.
***************************
Contrary to what the Dems and MSM have shouted for years, Fox News has never been a “conservative” channel. They have far more talking heads and producers that are Dem/liberal than Conservative. FNC does, however, produce a more fair and balanced view of political news than other cable channels or the broadcast channels.
I saw Napolitano’s segment and I think he’s defending the judge fraternity. The Constitution clearly states that a person has to be under the jurisdiction of the United States and illegal aliens are not as are the children of ambassadors and diplomats born in the US. They do not automatically become US citizens based on the location of their birth. This idea of birthright citizenship comes from judges interpreting the Constitution, it is the opposite of what is clearly written. Slaves were under the jurisdiction of the United States, especially after the Union won the Civil War and so were citizens at birth. Illegals clearly are under the jurisdiction of their own countries.
"Whoa, what a tough crowd!Why on earth is it necessary to insult (and nastily so) folks who you should be trying to court, politically?
I would suggest that Y'all and Ms. Perino agree on almost everything; and, this close to an election, it is a good time to NOT disenfranchise those who just might be valuable allies."
She's getting off easy here. She is a fraud who is promoting surrender just like Karl Rove an Krauthammer and Jorge Ramos all coincidentally did ... tonight ... on FOXey News. Their position is 'you can't possibly get them all, so let's get none.' That meshes with the Chamber of Commerce Department of Soft Slavery. Do you agree as well? If not, why defend her and this out-in-the-open admission that they were frauds all along, taking our votes while doing the bidding of the enemy.
"So far, Mr. Trump is (roughly, I'm guessing) 25% of the GOP-leaning 45% of the electorate. (You are not dealing from a position of electoral strength, even though (via polls) Mister Trump leads the GOP field.)"
Your math is operating under the mother of all wrong assumptions - that Trump's support is all (R)epublicans! If you bother to look around anywhere, and everywhere, his support is cross party and indeed extra party. He is systematically energizing a wide base and I happen to personally know (D)emocrats and Non-Voters who are very excited. If he is nominated, I expect the war cry to be: It's the Jobs, Stupid. Something that will go over very well across the spectrum.
There are loads of blue collar and white collar workers, union and non-union just itching to get the yoke of the modern (D)emocrat party's liberalism and political correctness and all those pet projects that didn't do anything for their real lives. They're literally shouting it in every thread in every website and news article that still allows comments. How did you miss it?
The only real question is whether the (R)epublicrat establishment can stop him in the primaries. This is Civil War. This is why Perino and Rove and all other Bush sycophants are in DEFCON 2. Watch what happens if or when he racks up primary delegates. DEFCON 1 will be EPIC.
"You people need to get real. You fall for Trumps B.S. all the time. Judge Napalitano was on the Megan Kelly show and he stated that each person being deported is Constitutionally required to have a hearing and an appeal. The most people ever deported in a year was 250,000. At that rate it would take 44 years to deport all 11 million illegal aliens. I know Trump supporter dont like facts, but Trump is being disingenuous if he says he is going to deport all 11 million illegal aliens."
The Judge had a senior moment.
According to him, the 14th Amendment is like a form of 'Impressment' where the USA by mere words on paper CLAIMS the souls of anyone born on it's soil. That is intellectually dishonest because it would require the identical words to be on paper in every other country.
Think about it. Consider a foreign country that has different words, words that say if their citizens have a baby anywhere including here, they claim it's soul. See the conflict? Are we superior?
Furthermore, you can't view the 14th Amendment that way because then that would mean that we claim the souls of children born of tourists, diplomats, foreign prisoners, POW's ( remember WWII ), and most important of all, American Indians.
The good judge is therefore being arbitrary in calling this a slam dunk for Mexican anchor babies with so many other possible exceptions already visited. Arbitrary laws pretty much defeats the entire point of the American Revolution and throwing off the yoke of the King's oppression.
He has always had this mad streak that puts forth the notion that the Constitution applies to everyone including foreigners. In this case he jumps the shark because he now adds in enemy invaders to the list. But since the Founders did not specify in Article IV "and to protect the states from invasion and violence" that invaders need be armed with muskets, all we can surmise is that the Judge believes the Constitution is a suicide pact. ;-)
As for your static math, it sucks. All static math sucks in a fluid environment. This is a dynamic system with positive and negative feedbacks. Self-Deportation is the main mechanism that comes into play once the precedent is set an publicized of invaders being deported out the back door. A simple law until we get a Constitutional Amendment that says "No person that enters the USA illegally shall ever be granted citizenship under any circumstances" would ignite an exodus. Ten years perhaps less, perhaps more. Every one that leaves is an improvement, or don't you believe that? Yes, in California, toilets would be going uncleaned and yards going unattended, and the jet set mansions would fall into disarray. Cry me a river.
"...11 million illegal aliens. ********************************* Damn! Im really tiring of hearing that repeated by every talking head on TV! (NOT ranting to you, glabbe)"
EXACTLY. They have been lying through their teeth for at least a dozen years. I have seen the number 13 million to 35 million. But the fact that we have such wide error bars IS THE DAMN POINT in the first place. We have +/- total invaders that is equal to the population of Australia.
Eternal vigilance is the price of liberty. Apparently that bargain price is still too high for many today to pay.
Dana is really stupid. I’m sick of her and her stupid dog. I’m also sick of RINOs who keep saying we can’t deport 12 million illegals. We don’t have to do it in one day, idiots.
Exactly the example I was going to use. The Lefties have no problem kicking our grannies out of the hospital and telling her Medicare has been cut by $700 billion. But they think Republicans are too weak to tell illegals they can no longer get free health care at the ER. They also think they're too squishy to tell illegals to go back to the countries WHERE THEY ARE CITIZENS.
Trump and Cruz are challenging the ruling class's world view and they can't stand it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.