>> Attacking him like this only makes him stronger and more popular <<
As far as I’m concerned, “attacking” is one thing, while “criticizing with facts” is entirely something else. And it seems to me that this article in the latter category.
Therefore, if you can analyze the factual inaccuracies in the article, that would be a worthwhile contribution to our understanding of the issues.
I’m not a Trumpeter, so no thanks. I was just giving friendly advice.
I'd be happy if we just agreed to face the facts: