To: Starstruck
And it’s also possible that law could be amended. What, for example, currently excludes the children of foreign ambassadors physically born here? It isn’t a constitutional thing. It has to be a law thing.
39 posted on
08/16/2015 1:38:54 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
And its also possible that law could be amended.The Constitution can be amended but the President has no role in that process. 2/3 of both the Senate and House propose the amendment and 3/4 of the states must ratify it. You can't just pass a law negating the constitution.
41 posted on
08/16/2015 1:44:32 PM PDT by
Starstruck
(I'm usually sarcastic. Deal with it.)
To: HiTech RedNeck
And its also possible that law could be amended. What, for example, currently excludes the children of foreign ambassadors physically born here? It isnt a constitutional thing. It has to be a law thing.That's exactly the point of the "subject to the jurisdiction" language. Foreign diplomats aren't fully subject to our laws. That's what diplomatic immunity is all about.
Ilegal aliens are.
43 posted on
08/16/2015 2:28:06 PM PDT by
semimojo
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson