Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: HiTech RedNeck
Which has been judicially interpreted as including the children of those present without permission.

How could you interpret it? The language is pretty straightforward.

22 posted on 08/16/2015 11:36:04 AM PDT by semimojo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]


To: semimojo

Sounds to me like exclusive jurisdiction is intended. I.e. these are “our” people and not “someone else’s” people.


27 posted on 08/16/2015 12:44:12 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: semimojo

Sounds to me like exclusive jurisdiction is intended. I.e. these are “our” people and not “someone else’s” people.

... again in context, this was about freedmen.


28 posted on 08/16/2015 12:45:29 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson