To: HiTech RedNeck
As I understand things ... the number of supers does not HAVE to be nine
D Trump proposes 2 more in a Republican Senate and voila !
(PLUS replace the dead one now living)
13 posted on
08/16/2015 11:16:30 AM PDT by
knarf
(I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true.)
To: knarf
Kind of a reverse FDR move
14 posted on
08/16/2015 11:20:11 AM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(Embrace the Lion of Judah and He will roar for you and teach you to roar too. See my page.)
To: knarf
“...the number of supremes does not HAVE to be nine, Trump proposes 2 more...”
-
9 - 11 ... why stop there?
16 posted on
08/16/2015 11:22:42 AM PDT by
Repeal The 17th
(I was conceived in liberty, how about you?)
To: knarf
Course then the next leftard will add ten new idiots. Not that that necessarily makes a conservative doing it a bad idea, now that it’s been brought up, the lib will probably do it anyway.
47 posted on
08/16/2015 6:38:29 PM PDT by
Still Thinking
(Freedom is NOT a loophole!Just read)
To: knarf
As I understand things ... the number of supers does not HAVE to be nine Interesting idea. But the Doofus on the Dime famously beat you to it.
59 posted on
08/17/2015 12:48:22 AM PDT by
cynwoody
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson