When there is a colorable claim that the law about what rights are, itself is in the air, this can’t apply.
Otherwise this sword could cut both ways. Why can’t gays get revenge under this section from “violations of their rights” prior to the USSC decision?
Actually it could be a hazard now as civil servants are engaging in civil disobedience. Now we have Right A vs. Right B. Does the winner get to send the loser away?
The predators certainly cannot attack bakers, florists, or photographers under this law, since it only applies when acting in an official government capacity. It could be stretched to apply to civil disobedience by government agents, but I don't see any defense against that beyond a good lawyer.