Posted on 08/14/2015 11:20:33 AM PDT by Fhios
"Hillary Clinton can't be held responsible for forwarding emails through her private server if they weren't marked as being classified, Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz said Thursday ..."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
* Alan needs to read the actual law. *
He doesn’t care anything about the law.
_resident's answer: "I was shocked to see it on the news."
LMAO well played!
Well Then. It’s obvious that Clinton has emails about him and his love of teenage girls.
Is she exempt from law
Is government exempt from its own law
“Hillary Clinton can’t be held responsible for forwarding emails through her private server if they weren’t marked as being classified, Harvard Law School professor Alan Dershowitz said Thursday ...”
He is correct. The question then becomes, since it is Clinton’s private server, someone with access to Hillary’s email has committed a felony and has violated several National Security regulations. Which means that person can and should be tried, convicted and sentenced according to the law.
In saying that Professor Dershowitz, since it is National Security, and not turning that person in also constitutes a felony offense, would it then be safe to say that Hillary, holding onto this information for almost two years is guilty of that?
Finally Professor Dershowitz, let’s take your first sentence and parse it, because that’s what rats do. “Her Private Server.” Let me reiterate....HER.
It is simply beyond plausible to suggest that a sitting Secretary of State was not aware that classified information could and would be sent to her by email. There is no way she could do her job without routinely reviewing classified data of the highest levels of sensitivity.
None of the possible explanations exonerate her.
“if they weren’t marked as being classified,”
That is why Hillary had her underlings remove any markings that said “classified” or higher.
Someone correct me if I am wrong; hasn’t it been said that her own employees were removing the classified labels? I she liable for that?
Dersowich is an idiot who does not understand Nation Security and Espionage laws.
Alan is still Sucking Up for Hillary. He will get the memo soon enough to change his tune now that the Obama Administration is imperiled.
The President is exempt as he cannot be prosecuted. Only impeached — which is a political process.
I think it precludes soft coups, like what would happen with Progressive Lawfare.
Just my opinion.
Yes, I think somebody is preparing themselves to taking the dive for Hillary.
Pure bullsh1t. I dont believe she didnt know.
Second, since when has ignorance of the law been any excuse for people? Govt hangs people for innocent ignorant transgressions.
Cops now can be ignorant of the law and get away with it.
The cojntry really does require a revolt. We are under gross iniquity, unbridled tyranny. On so many levels.
Huma already muff dives for Hillary. Gonna be the other gal, unless Hillary has to murder her like Foster.
An excuse like that would only work for a DemonRat.
A high ranking DemonRat at that.
So the SOS has no notion that the material they are looking at might need to be classified?! Dershowitz’s observation may be legally correct, but that just saves her from a jump suit. It doesn’t exonerate her from be “responsible” for the breech. It either displays total incompetence or a blase attitude toward U.S. security. Either should be sufficient to disqualify her from being CIC.
I would like to hear Mark Levin’s opinion of this assertion by Dershowitz.
Maybe he’ll touch on it on tonight’s show.
“As the ultimate respected USA attorney, I can’t see anything illegal in what Hillary did with her private server,” said Alan Dershowitz. He added, “This has absolutely nothing to do with Bill Clinton having access to videos of me raping a sixteen year old. That is a completely separate issue and should not even be considered.”
I recall a pic here during the Clinton trial, it was Lil’ Dirtyshitz using his briefcase as a booster seat so he could see over the table or some such. Heh!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.