Don't get me wrong. I think it's perfectly reasonable to be skeptical and asked pointed questions about the risk/benefit calculations for specific vaccine. We did that with Gardasil a few years ago. But my point was that the people we know who best informed about vaccines are unwilling to expose their healthy children to communicable diseases for which there are reasonably safe (but obviously not risk-free) vaccines.
I know six now who don’t vax at all. For anything. Their reasoning for the most part is the inclusion of fetal dna fragments in the live vaccines and the presence of mercury and/or aluminum in all of them.
Of the docs you know who admit to vaccinating, how many of them still have minor children at home and currently practice licensed medicine. The medical boards are ruthless in their repression of anyone who doesn’t toe the official line.
The common argument is that they’re either all made in China or elsewhere with ingredients made in China. And the manufacturers are indemnified. What could possibly go wrong!?
Look at the schedule since the manufacturers were indemnified in ‘86. How many of the vaxs since then are for ‘pandemic’ ‘easily communicable’ diseases.
Most of the rest give the ‘88 schedule, delayed. A couple have given the HepB to teens because risk for that goes up when sexual activity becomes more likely. Unlike with 12hr old infants. Or even 2yr olds.
And then there’s this stuff:
http://www.c-span.org/video/?c4546421/rep-bill-posey-calling-investigation-cdcs-mmr-reasearch-fraud
Which makes anyone who’s ever done science for a living wonder just how much OTHER inconvenient research has gone into a big garbage can...