That's not your normally well thought out post. You may think he's a tiny voice, and on talk radio, he is - but every candidate badly wanted to be at his event - and yes, it was HIS event, this weekend. Every one of them. THATS NOT INSIGNIFICANT. He's not just a talk host. That's almost an after thought to him and not his base of influence. Cunningham nor Ingraham are hosting all the candidates to my knowledge.
And there's no false accusations going on here. It's just a line in the sand on the Trump effect. I happen to think the truth about Trump is somewhere between Rush and EE.
The menstruation accusation was a false accusation. It was never said by Trump, in listening to the interview there’s no indication of it being hinted at, and that makes it a case in which Erickson literally put words in Trump’s mouth that Trump did not say. A fabrication.
FWIW, Erickson runs his website with a very heavy hand that brooks no dissent and tolerates no criticism.
As to your article, CEW, it was extremely well written. Don’t think I’m criticizing it. I’m not. I also think it asks a relevant question.
My point is that middleweights should think twice about taking on heavyweights, and especially if they’re not even one of the better middleweights.
FWIW, Erickson runs his website with a very heavy hand that brooks no dissent and tolerates no criticism.
As to your article, CEW, it was extremely well written. Don't think I'm criticizing it. I'm not.
Just for some context, Erickson isn't even among the top 30 names: