Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: C. Edmund Wright
Fine. And I had promised myself that I was going to take a hiatus from posting about Trump ...

I see this as Erickson doubling down on his dumb decision to disinvite Trump. And what a double down! He is not only fighting Trump, but he now dares Rush to pick a side too?! SRSLY?! There is no mystery as to how this will end up.

Clearly Rush will not 'apologize' for his treatment of "Trump phenomenon" or change his treatment of Trump on his program. Anything else would be like Trump apologizing for something he said. Erickson will find himself on an island. Trump and his supporters (this includes not only folks who will vote for him but also includes folks who favor others but who love how Trump has unapologetically defined the narratives for this election and shown that the eventual primary winner will come from the "fighter caucus") outnumber him greatly. If Trump won a spat with Megyn Kelly, a bout with Erickson will be a complete annihilation. The Trump phenomenon is anti-politician, anti-Establishment ... anti-Jeb/McConnell/Boehner/DC cabal (and this backlash 'phenomenon' is in fact their own creation/fault, a movement so sickened by their fecklessness, they dedicated to their removal from leadership) ... and fighting against it for 2016 is fruitless. The more you attack Trump, the stronger you make him.

If someone (Erickson or whomever) wants a different candidate than Trump to represent the "fighter caucus", they best figure out how to illustrate that their guy will be better than Trump without resorting to attacking Trump in the process. Treat it as a 'Shark Tank' competition ... beat him with better ideas, methods, marketing.

Or possibly ... even turn Trump into your biggest fan, investor and backer.


61 posted on 08/14/2015 6:29:23 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Servant of the Cross

Rush has been ignoring, for the most part, Trumps liberal reflexes on Planned Parenthood, on trade, on Ford, and on health care. This is not Rush like.

I don’t think Rush is living up to HIS 27 year standards of proportionality, and a relentless pursuit of the truth. Rush has only pursued the positive truth about Trump, and inappropriately downplayed the negative. I think that’s what David LImbaugh’s column today is about...a little tiny red flag he hopes his brother takes a peek at.

EE v Rush? No contest normally, but I think they’re both gonna get a little dinged in this one.


66 posted on 08/14/2015 6:36:18 AM PDT by C. Edmund Wright (WTF? How Karl Rove and the Establishment Lost...Again)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

To: Servant of the Cross

“Erickson doubling down on his dumb decision to disinvite Trump”

It’s simply a PR campaign, not to be taken any more seriously than that.


112 posted on 08/14/2015 7:13:48 AM PDT by mrsmith (Dumb sluts: Lifeblood of the Media, Backbone of the Democrat/RINO Party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson