Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: markomalley

I’m fairly certain that even 1% is too much spent on the slaughter of innocent children.

Trump is painting himself into a corner on this issue. He likely wasn’t prepared to deal with it either considering his pro-life conversion occurred at the same time as all of his other about faces.

If he had been smart he would have said that he would defund PP and spend the same amount that had been allocated for PP on female oriented clinics and medical facilities that don’t provide abortions. It would allow him to take a stand against barbarism while making it hard to claim that he’s against women’s health.


18 posted on 08/12/2015 4:52:06 AM PDT by Reaper19
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Reaper19

-— He likely wasn’t prepared to deal with it -—

“It” being the most important public policy issue of our times.

His ignorance tells you where his heart is.

Trump is simply an unprincipled, unprepared pragmatist. He can be useful on an issue-by-issue basis, but not as the leader of people who want to be free.


22 posted on 08/12/2015 4:55:52 AM PDT by St_Thomas_Aquinas ( Isaiah 22:22, Matthew 16:19, Revelation 3:7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

To: Reaper19

That is exactly the thought I was trying to make. Your idea is wonderful and some conservative needs to use it. Don’t scare women by taking away their means of care with no alternate but add your idea of “non abortion” female care clinics to their statement of defunding the butchers. It would be well received.


36 posted on 08/12/2015 5:35:58 AM PDT by nclaurel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson